to teach logo
Sign up

Basic Knowledge Astronomy

TT
by to-teach Team
6 pagesGrade 5 and abovePhysics, Geography, non-subject specific content
Template

Loading preview…

Your worksheet

Enter a heavenly body.

Need an idea?

Popular topics from other teachers

How our AI templates work

  • Content gets adapted

    Examples, texts and tasks match your focus.

  • Method & structure stay

    The didactically reviewed structure of the template won't change.

Description

Objective: This worksheet aims to teach students about a selected topic from the field of astronomy.


Content and methods: The worksheet introduces the selected topic with a brief text. It uses true/false questions to test reading comprehension and a fictional interview with a famous astrophysicist to provide more context on the history of research and current scientific questions. The final section prompts students to explain concepts and summarize information from the interview.


Competencies:

  • Reading comprehension
  • Recalling and summarizing key information
  • Analysis and critical thinking


Target group: 5-12th grade

Similar worksheets

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Learning Objectives

The overarching learning objective is to develop students’ awareness and mastery of the characteristics of academic and subject-specific language, as well as to strengthen their ability to transform language. Students should learn to analyse typical features of academic texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) according to defined criteria, reflect on their functional effects in terms of objectivity and how they guide the reader, and purposefully translate dense, nominalised academic language into clear, accessible verbal style using active voice.

Content and Methods

The worksheet introduces the key characteristics of academic non-fiction texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) and combines text analysis with practical language exercises. Working with a subject-specific text, students first compile a glossary of technical terms with context-based definitions and distinguish between passive constructions and nominal style using a two-colour highlighting technique.

Building on this, they conduct a functional stylistic analysis to examine the intended effects of linguistic density and the author’s conveyed stance towards the subject matter. The worksheet concludes with an active language transformation task in which students rewrite a highly nominalised example sentence that omits the agent, turning it into dynamic active-voice sentences. This involves breaking down complex verb-noun constructions and explicitly introducing the actors performing the actions.

Competencies

  • Linguistic and grammatical analysis: Confidently identifying and clarifying technical terminology, as well as recognising syntactic forms of linguistic compression (nominal style and passive constructions).
  • Functional and stylistic judgement: Reflecting on the rhetorical effects and functions of linguistic distance, objectivity, and impersonal presentation in academic texts.
  • Language transformation: Purposefully translating complex, agentless nominal constructions into clear, action-oriented active sentences using verbal style.
  • Lexical comprehension: Deriving the meaning of unfamiliar or highly specialised technical terms from context and formulating concise definitions (glossary work).

Target Group and Level

Upper secondary school (advanced level).

GeographyBiologyPoliticsChemistryHistory
Reading comprehension -  Sorting words by characteristics

Reading comprehension - Sorting words by characteristics

The overarching learning objective is the systematic development of reading comprehension and linguistic reflection. Learners will be enabled to classify words according to grammatical and semantic properties (parts of speech, concrete vs. abstract nouns) and to decode the emotional impact of language (denotation vs. connotation) in order to critically question manipulative text structures in everyday life and the media.


Content and Methods: The worksheet embeds fundamental grammatical knowledge into a playful fantasy scenario (“Magic Library”). First, learners sort a word collection by parts of speech and semantic dimensions, which is subsequently structured cooperatively in a mind map (“thought tree”) and reinforced through a physical movement game in the classroom. Building on this, a theoretical and practical introduction to the concepts of denotation and connotation takes place. Learners examine word clusters on an “emotion scale,” unmask evaluative PR terminology, and apply their knowledge practically by rewriting a negative review into a positive text through the targeted replacement of emotionally charged words.


Competencies:

  • Grammatical analysis competence: Confident identification and classification of parts of speech, as well as the precise distinction between concrete and abstract terms.
  • Semantic reflection competence: Understanding the distinction between the objective meaning (denotation) and the emotional resonance (connotation) of words.
  • Media and linguistic critique skills: Recognizing linguistic manipulation and evaluative wording in everyday texts, reviews, or media reports.
  • Formulation competence: Targeted and deliberate use of evaluative language to modify the overall impact of a text (rewriting/reframing).

Target Group: Lower and middle secondary school

Note: Small word cards must be prepared for the “Who Am I?” game.

non-subject specific contentEnglish
From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

This worksheet aims to provide students with a solid understanding of the significance and function of academic language and to help them practice actively using it in subject-specific instruction. Students will recognize that academic language serves as an essential tool for presenting complex topics in an objective, impersonal, and precise manner, and that the ability to switch between everyday language and academic language is a key skill. Through guided practice in translating everyday observations into formal language, they learn to use subject-specific linguistic tools, to put their own thoughts into writing in a structured manner, and to reflectively evaluate their own learning process and linguistic expression.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines cognitive awareness, guided writing practice, independent text production, and self-evaluation. After an introductory informational text on the distinction between everyday language and academic language, as well as an introduction to subject-specific language tools (e.g., for cause-and-effect relationships, hypothesis formation, or evaluations), learners gradually translate given everyday statements into logically structured academic language. They then apply this translation technique to their own current course material and reflect on the advantages and challenges of academic language formulation. The module concludes with a structured self-assessment matrix designed to evaluate their own language competencies and identify remaining learning needs.

Competencies:

Learners can...

  • identify the difference between everyday language and academic language and explain the importance of precise technical language for subject-matter understanding.
  • identify and purposefully apply specific subject-specific language tools (e.g., phrasing guides for descriptions, justifications, and analyses).
  • systematically translate colloquial observations into precise, factual, and logically structured sentences using formal language.
  • structure their own conceptual ideas derived from current classroom activities and independently put them into writing using appropriate technical terms.
  • critically reflect on their own language translation process and evaluate their individual strengths and areas for development in the use of formal language.

Target Audience and Level:

Grade 8 and above

non-subject specific contentChemistryBiologyGeographyGerman
Recognizing Greenwashing

Recognizing Greenwashing

The goal of this worksheet is to enable students to independently identify and critically examine manipulative marketing strategies in retail. Using a specific case study, they will develop the theoretical foundation needed to distinguish between genuine sustainability promises and deliberate consumer deception, so they can make informed, independent consumer decisions in their daily lives.

Content and Methods: The content focuses on the definition and strategic characteristics of greenwashing, its psychological impact, and an analysis of legal consequences. Methodologically, the worksheet combines an image-based case analysis with in-depth journalistic text analysis. A video-based summary of theoretical categories of deception and a practical, criteria-based checklist serve to reinforce knowledge and facilitate active application to students’ own consumer behavior.

Competencies:

Analytical Competence: Students can systematically deconstruct visual design elements, price placements, and advertising messages in digital user interfaces.

Substantive Competence: They understand the definition of the technical term “greenwashing” and can distinguish between vague marketing phrases and verifiable sustainability labels.

Critical thinking skills: Students are able to critically evaluate the discrepancy between corporate sustainability reports and actual environmental impacts.

Reflective thinking skills: They can critically examine their own susceptibility to manipulative sales strategies and identify alternative courses of action.

Target audience and grade level: Intermediate (8th-10th grade)


EconomicsGeography
Chemistry in Search of Evidence

Chemistry in Search of Evidence

Objective: This worksheet uses a fictional criminal case to introduce students to the basics of nuclear chemistry and atomic structure in a playful way. Students examine β⁻ decay using the example of an isotope and learn to quantitatively determine atomic composition and radioactive decay processes based on atomic and mass numbers.


Content and Methods: The material is taught by combining contextual learning, tabular particle analyses, and mathematical methods for describing radioactive processes. The starting point is a fictional case file in which a laboratory investigation is used to develop fundamental questions about nuclear transformations and radiation. Building on this, the isotopes are analyzed in terms of their proton, neutron, and electron counts, and nuclear reaction equations and the principle of β⁻ decay are explored. This is supplemented by a quantitative evaluation of radioactive decay using half-life calculations to determine residual amounts and sample age, before students assess their understanding in a short, summary exit ticket.


Competencies:

  • Subject-specific competence: Distinguishing between basic physical and chemical concepts (isotope, atomic number, mass number) and classifying nuclear transformations
  • Scientific inquiry: Mathematical modeling of decay processes using half-life functions and deriving nuclear reaction equations
  • Communication and Explanation Skills: Simplifying complex atomic processes to suit the audience


Target Audience and Level: Middle School

ChemistryPhysics