Friedliches Zusammenleben in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft

Learning Objectives

The overarching learning objective is to develop students’ awareness and mastery of the characteristics of academic and subject-specific language, as well as to strengthen their ability to transform language. Students should learn to analyse typical features of academic texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) according to defined criteria, reflect on their functional effects in terms of objectivity and how they guide the reader, and purposefully translate dense, nominalised academic language into clear, accessible verbal style using active voice.

Content and Methods

The worksheet introduces the key characteristics of academic non-fiction texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) and combines text analysis with practical language exercises. Working with a subject-specific text, students first compile a glossary of technical terms with context-based definitions and distinguish between passive constructions and nominal style using a two-colour highlighting technique.

Building on this, they conduct a functional stylistic analysis to examine the intended effects of linguistic density and the author’s conveyed stance towards the subject matter. The worksheet concludes with an active language transformation task in which students rewrite a highly nominalised example sentence that omits the agent, turning it into dynamic active-voice sentences. This involves breaking down complex verb-noun constructions and explicitly introducing the actors performing the actions.

Competencies

• Linguistic and grammatical analysis: Confidently identifying and clarifying technical terminology, as well as recognising syntactic forms of linguistic compression (nominal style and passive constructions).
• Functional and stylistic judgement: Reflecting on the rhetorical effects and functions of linguistic distance, objectivity, and impersonal presentation in academic texts.
• Language transformation: Purposefully translating complex, agentless nominal constructions into clear, action-oriented active sentences using verbal style.
• Lexical comprehension: Deriving the meaning of unfamiliar or highly specialised technical terms from context and formulating concise definitions (glossary work).

Target Group and Level

Upper secondary school (advanced level).

Objective: This worksheet aims to teach students a methodologically sound approach to exploring and applying educational theories. Students will recognize that simply memorizing theoretical concepts is not enough; rather, it is only by applying them to concrete practical examples that they can develop a deep professional understanding. Through guided case analysis, they learn to link abstract theoretical constructs and dense technical terminology to real-world educational situations (e.g., in schools, daycare centers, or group homes). They practice explaining theory-based connections using sound technical language, thereby bridging the gap between academic theory and practical application.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines targeted reading practice, theoretical text analysis, and practical case studies. At the beginning, students are provided with specific strategies for effectively reading complex educational texts. In the main section, they first work through the fundamentals of a specific educational theory based on an informational text. They then apply this knowledge to a relevant, real-life case study. Using a structured, three-column case matrix, they identify key theoretical aspects in three systematic steps, assign corresponding sequences of actions by the actors in the case study to these aspects, and finally explain the theory-based connection using precise technical terminology.

Competencies: Learners can...

• apply goal-oriented reading strategies (such as structuring, targeted highlighting, and paraphrasing) to systematically analyze complex educational texts
• identify and define key terms, core statements, and subprocesses of an educational theory from an informational text
• analyze an educational case study and identify behaviors or actions of the individuals described that are relevant to the theory
• structuredly link theoretical constructs to concrete practical examples in a case matrix (mapping skill)
• coherently justify the connection between theoretical principles and concrete behavior in a theory-driven manner and using correct technical terminology

Target Audience and Level: Trainees in the social education sector

Note: Using the Internet can be helpful when working on some of the exercises.

This worksheet introduces future professionals to the biopsychological foundations of adolescence. Learners should recognize that challenging behavior often results from neurological changes and is not a deliberate act of aggression. The goal is to distinguish between the person and their actions in order to act in a way that de-escalates situations, provides support, and maintains positive relationships in their daily professional practice.

Content and Methods:

The material combines theoretical input from developmental psychology with practical case studies and self-reflection. After exploring the neurological foundations, learners “decode” typical behaviors. In a subsequent case analysis, they critically evaluate educational interventions and develop alternative professional approaches. A concluding reflection on their own emotional “triggers” reinforces their professional attitude.

Competencies:

Learners can...

• explain the neurological and psychological changes that occur during adolescence (particularly the interaction between the limbic system and the prefrontal cortex).
• psychologically interpret observable, challenging adolescent behavior (such as provocation, rule-breaking, or shame) and classify it as an age-typical developmental task.
• critically analyze the actions of professionals in acute crisis situations (e.g., in cases of extreme risk-taking behavior) with regard to de-escalation, the duty to protect, and relationship-building.
• Develop professional and practical alternative courses of action that simultaneously set clear boundaries and preserve the adolescents’ emotional safety.
• Reflect on one’s own emotional “triggers” when interacting with adolescents in order to maintain professional distance and composure in everyday work.

Target group and level:

Adult students or trainees in the field of social pedagogy, particularly aspiring educators.

This worksheet aims to provide aspiring educators with a solid sociological understanding of the “adolescence” life stage based on Klaus Hurrelmann’s model of developmental tasks. Learners will gain an awareness of the specific challenges, areas of conflict, and identity-formation processes that adolescents must navigate. They will learn to apply theoretical developmental tasks to concrete everyday situations faced by adolescents, analyze critical factors such as school-related pressure to perform, and develop strategies to alleviate these pressures in educational practice.

Content and Methods: This worksheet addresses the specific characteristics and challenges of adolescence, the four central developmental tasks identified by Klaus Hurrelmann (acquiring skills, forming bonds, consuming, and participating), as well as the tension between various societal influences and the development of identity in children and adolescents. Methodologically, the worksheet employs a combination of personal reflection and partner discussions to define concepts, an informative academic text with a tabular classification of everyday examples, and a small-group problem analysis to develop practical, stress-reducing approaches for educational practice.

Competencies:

Learners can...

• describe the characteristics of adolescence and distinguish it from childhood and adulthood, providing reasons for their distinctions.
• explain the four developmental tasks identified by Klaus Hurrelmann (acquiring skills, forming bonds, consuming, participating) and classify everyday situations according to these criteria.
• critically reflect on the causes and consequences of academic pressure on adolescents’ identity and personality development.
• design and justify action-oriented approaches and strategies to alleviate pressure in schools and educational settings.

Target group and level:

Adult students or trainees in the field of social pedagogy, particularly aspiring educators.

This worksheet aims to provide aspiring educators with a solid understanding of the stages of child development (early, middle, and late childhood). Learners should be made aware of how to correctly classify developmental phenomena and milestones in the areas of motor skills, cognition, language, and emotional/social development. They will learn to critically compare their own everyday experiences with scientific findings, to analyze everyday observations from a professional perspective, and to design needs-based educational interventions based on a needs assessment.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines visual stimuli, prior knowledge, academic texts, social media analyses, and case studies. After assessing their prior knowledge of the three stages of childhood, students explore the developmental characteristics of each stage in terms of motor skills, cognition, language, and social behavior. Using fictional tweets from professional practice, they classify developmental phenomena according to academic categories. The unit concludes with a case study from a selected stage of childhood, for which students conduct a needs assessment and develop a well-reasoned practical plan.

Competencies:

Learners can...

• describe and distinguish between the developmental stages of early, middle, and late childhood in terms of their motor, cognitive, and social-emotional dimensions,
• identify key developmental phenomena (e.g., the emergence of self-awareness, magical thinking, acquisition of cultural skills) in observational data and explain them using specialized terminology,
• systematically compare their own practical observations with expert knowledge of developmental theory,
• conduct a pedagogical needs assessment for a specific case study and, based on this, develop and justify tailored pedagogical interventions.

Target group and level:

Adult students or trainees in the field of social pedagogy, particularly aspiring educators.

 Students explore their own needs and personal sources of strength and reflect on what contributes to their well-being.

Content and methods: The worksheet uses a needs table in which students first identify their own sources of strength and then assess how well their needs are currently being met. They then identify the needs with the lowest scores, choose suitable self-care strategies, and develop concrete next steps. An audio example, an overview of different self-care strategies, and a buddy agreement support reflection and help students put their ideas into practice in everyday life.

Skills:

• identify personal needs and sources of strength
• reflect on their own well-being
• choose appropriate self-care strategies
• plan concrete steps for action
• make conscious use of support from others

Target group and level: Suitable for secondary school students, particularly for developing self-reflection, health awareness, and social-emotional skills.

This worksheet aims to introduce students to the "trolley problem" as a fundamental ethical dilemma, encouraging them to evaluate moral decision-making through the lens of different philosophical theories and their modern application in artificial intelligence and autonomous driving.

Content and methods: The worksheet uses a multimedia approach, starting with a video-based discussion of the trolley scenario. It then provides informative texts on utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and moral relativism to facilitate theoretical understanding. Students apply these concepts through comprehension questions, analytical writing tasks, and a creative "pitch" presentation where they role-play as programmers to address the ethical challenges of self-driving cars.

Competencies:

• Ethical reasoning and moral judgment
• Application of philosophical theories to modern technology
• Critical thinking and perspective-taking
• Argumentation and presentation skills
• Reading and media literacy

Target group: Grade 10 and above

Objectives

The goal is to learn the Jigsaw method as a way to independently explore complex philosophical models of thought. Participants engage objectively and critically with fundamental questions of existence and evaluate them through academic discussion. The sample content serves as a flexible template for systematic method training.

Content and Methods

This Worksheet uses a cooperative Jigsaw structure to explore core philosophical ideas. After an individual specialization phase, students deepen their knowledge in expert groups and then share it in home groups. Results are organized in a table that highlights major works and key theses. A short, fictional role-play at the end places each position in a contemporary context. All content choices - both the selection of philosophers and the theories - are designed to be interchangeable.

Competencies

• Subject Knowledge: Understanding central philosophical movements and the ability to concisely summarize complex models of thought.
• Methodological Skills: Confident use of the Jigsaw method as a cooperative learning approach and proficiency in focused academic research.
• Critical Judgment: Objective engagement with differing worldviews and their relevance for contemporary epistemology.
• Social and Communication Skills: Responsible peer-to-peer knowledge sharing and facilitation of perspective-taking through role-play.

Target Group and Level

Middle and upper secondary

Objective: The worksheet raises learners' awareness of the potential of artificial intelligence to promote inclusion and accessibility. The aim is to understand how technological assistance systems can increase the independence of people with disabilities in everyday life.

Content and methods: The content includes an introduction to AI-supported assistance functions for people with disabilities, basic knowledge about this form of disability, typical barriers in everyday life, and ethical issues relating to data protection, accessibility, and the relationship between human and technical support. This is supplemented by practical case studies and the development of students' own app ideas as an application of what they have learned. The methods include the assignment and analysis of specific AI functions, theoretical impulses with hypothesis formation, empathic role-playing, scenario-based case work, creative project work on app design, and structured reflection and discussion phases on ethical aspects.

Competencies:

• Perspective taking: Developing empathy for the realities of life for people with disabilities
• Media and technology skills: Recognizing AI as a tool for assistive technologies
• Problem-solving skills: Transferring technological knowledge to complex everyday obstacles
• Ethical judgment: Critical examination of social conditions

Target group and level: Grade 8 and above