to teach logo
Sign up

Selbstwirksamkeit stärken

TT
by to-teach Team
7 pagesab Klasse 8non-subject specific content, Psychology
Template

Loading preview…

Your worksheet

Create a problem. The students then develop a concept to strengthen self-efficacy and solve the problem.

Need an idea?

Popular topics from other teachers

How our AI templates work

  • Content gets adapted

    Examples, texts and tasks match your focus.

  • Method & structure stay

    The didactically reviewed structure of the template won't change.

Description

Zielsetzung: Das übergeordnete Lernziel des Arbeitsblattes besteht darin, den Lernenden ein theoretisches Verständnis für das psychologische Konzept des Vertrauens in die eigene Handlungsfähigkeit zu vermitteln. Die Schülerinnen und Schüler sollen befähigt werden, Mechanismen der Selbstbeeinflussung zu erkennen, individuelle Erfolgserlebnisse zu reflektieren und Strategien zu entwickeln, um Herausforderungen und Blockaden aus eigener Kraft oder durch soziale Unterstützung erfolgreich zu bewältigen.

Inhalte und Methoden: Inhaltlich konzentriert sich das Material auf die Definition und die vier zentralen Quellen der Selbstwirksamkeit nach Albert Bandura: eigene Erfolgserlebnisse, stellvertretende Erfahrungen durch Vorbilder, verbale Ermutigung sowie die Interpretation körperlicher Signale. Methodisch setzt das Arbeitsblatt auf einen Mix aus Informationstexten, einem audiovisuellen Impuls und praxisorientierten Anwendungsaufgaben. Anhand von Fallbeispielen in Quizform und einer Textanalyse eines fiktiven Chatverlaufs werden die theoretischen Inhalte in lebensnahe Kontexte transferiert, bevor eine abschließende Reflexion in Partnerarbeit den Transfer auf die eigene Lebenswelt der Lernenden sicherstellt.

Kompetenzen:

  • Fachkompetenz: Die Lernenden können das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit definieren, von verwandten Begriffen wie dem Selbstwertgefühl abgrenzen und die vier Entstehungsquellen nach Bandura benennen und erläutern.
  • Methodenkompetenz: Die Schülerinnen und Schüler sind in der Lage, komplexe Verhaltensmuster in Fallbeispielen zu analysieren, Informationen aus verschiedenen Medientypen zu extrahieren und theoretische Modelle auf konkrete Problemsituationen anzuwenden.
  • Sozial- und Selbstkompetenz: Die Lernenden reflektieren ihr eigenes Handeln bei Herausforderungen, entwickeln Strategien zur Angstbewältigung und stärken durch gegenseitige Beratung und Ermutigung ihre Kommunikations- und Unterstützungsfähigkeit.

Zielgruppe und Niveau: Ab Klasse 8

Similar worksheets

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Learning Objectives

The overarching learning objective is to develop students’ awareness and mastery of the characteristics of academic and subject-specific language, as well as to strengthen their ability to transform language. Students should learn to analyse typical features of academic texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) according to defined criteria, reflect on their functional effects in terms of objectivity and how they guide the reader, and purposefully translate dense, nominalised academic language into clear, accessible verbal style using active voice.

Content and Methods

The worksheet introduces the key characteristics of academic non-fiction texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) and combines text analysis with practical language exercises. Working with a subject-specific text, students first compile a glossary of technical terms with context-based definitions and distinguish between passive constructions and nominal style using a two-colour highlighting technique.

Building on this, they conduct a functional stylistic analysis to examine the intended effects of linguistic density and the author’s conveyed stance towards the subject matter. The worksheet concludes with an active language transformation task in which students rewrite a highly nominalised example sentence that omits the agent, turning it into dynamic active-voice sentences. This involves breaking down complex verb-noun constructions and explicitly introducing the actors performing the actions.

Competencies

  • Linguistic and grammatical analysis: Confidently identifying and clarifying technical terminology, as well as recognising syntactic forms of linguistic compression (nominal style and passive constructions).
  • Functional and stylistic judgement: Reflecting on the rhetorical effects and functions of linguistic distance, objectivity, and impersonal presentation in academic texts.
  • Language transformation: Purposefully translating complex, agentless nominal constructions into clear, action-oriented active sentences using verbal style.
  • Lexical comprehension: Deriving the meaning of unfamiliar or highly specialised technical terms from context and formulating concise definitions (glossary work).

Target Group and Level

Upper secondary school (advanced level).

GeographyBiologyPoliticsChemistryHistory
Reading comprehension -  Sorting words by characteristics

Reading comprehension - Sorting words by characteristics

The overarching learning objective is the systematic development of reading comprehension and linguistic reflection. Learners will be enabled to classify words according to grammatical and semantic properties (parts of speech, concrete vs. abstract nouns) and to decode the emotional impact of language (denotation vs. connotation) in order to critically question manipulative text structures in everyday life and the media.


Content and Methods: The worksheet embeds fundamental grammatical knowledge into a playful fantasy scenario (“Magic Library”). First, learners sort a word collection by parts of speech and semantic dimensions, which is subsequently structured cooperatively in a mind map (“thought tree”) and reinforced through a physical movement game in the classroom. Building on this, a theoretical and practical introduction to the concepts of denotation and connotation takes place. Learners examine word clusters on an “emotion scale,” unmask evaluative PR terminology, and apply their knowledge practically by rewriting a negative review into a positive text through the targeted replacement of emotionally charged words.


Competencies:

  • Grammatical analysis competence: Confident identification and classification of parts of speech, as well as the precise distinction between concrete and abstract terms.
  • Semantic reflection competence: Understanding the distinction between the objective meaning (denotation) and the emotional resonance (connotation) of words.
  • Media and linguistic critique skills: Recognizing linguistic manipulation and evaluative wording in everyday texts, reviews, or media reports.
  • Formulation competence: Targeted and deliberate use of evaluative language to modify the overall impact of a text (rewriting/reframing).

Target Group: Lower and middle secondary school

Note: Small word cards must be prepared for the “Who Am I?” game.

non-subject specific contentEnglish
Methodology Module: Pedagogy - Step-by-Step Guide to Theory-Based Case Analysis

Methodology Module: Pedagogy - Step-by-Step Guide to Theory-Based Case Analysis

Objective: This worksheet aims to teach students a methodologically sound approach to exploring and applying educational theories. Students will recognize that simply memorizing theoretical concepts is not enough; rather, it is only by applying them to concrete practical examples that they can develop a deep professional understanding. Through guided case analysis, they learn to link abstract theoretical constructs and dense technical terminology to real-world educational situations (e.g., in schools, daycare centers, or group homes). They practice explaining theory-based connections using sound technical language, thereby bridging the gap between academic theory and practical application.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines targeted reading practice, theoretical text analysis, and practical case studies. At the beginning, students are provided with specific strategies for effectively reading complex educational texts. In the main section, they first work through the fundamentals of a specific educational theory based on an informational text. They then apply this knowledge to a relevant, real-life case study. Using a structured, three-column case matrix, they identify key theoretical aspects in three systematic steps, assign corresponding sequences of actions by the actors in the case study to these aspects, and finally explain the theory-based connection using precise technical terminology.

Competencies: Learners can...

  • apply goal-oriented reading strategies (such as structuring, targeted highlighting, and paraphrasing) to systematically analyze complex educational texts
  • identify and define key terms, core statements, and subprocesses of an educational theory from an informational text
  • analyze an educational case study and identify behaviors or actions of the individuals described that are relevant to the theory
  • structuredly link theoretical constructs to concrete practical examples in a case matrix (mapping skill)
  • coherently justify the connection between theoretical principles and concrete behavior in a theory-driven manner and using correct technical terminology

Target Audience and Level: Trainees in the social education sector


Note: Using the Internet can be helpful when working on some of the exercises.

PedagogySocial PedagogyEthicsPsychologyHealth and Social Care
From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

This worksheet aims to provide students with a solid understanding of the significance and function of academic language and to help them practice actively using it in subject-specific instruction. Students will recognize that academic language serves as an essential tool for presenting complex topics in an objective, impersonal, and precise manner, and that the ability to switch between everyday language and academic language is a key skill. Through guided practice in translating everyday observations into formal language, they learn to use subject-specific linguistic tools, to put their own thoughts into writing in a structured manner, and to reflectively evaluate their own learning process and linguistic expression.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines cognitive awareness, guided writing practice, independent text production, and self-evaluation. After an introductory informational text on the distinction between everyday language and academic language, as well as an introduction to subject-specific language tools (e.g., for cause-and-effect relationships, hypothesis formation, or evaluations), learners gradually translate given everyday statements into logically structured academic language. They then apply this translation technique to their own current course material and reflect on the advantages and challenges of academic language formulation. The module concludes with a structured self-assessment matrix designed to evaluate their own language competencies and identify remaining learning needs.

Competencies:

Learners can...

  • identify the difference between everyday language and academic language and explain the importance of precise technical language for subject-matter understanding.
  • identify and purposefully apply specific subject-specific language tools (e.g., phrasing guides for descriptions, justifications, and analyses).
  • systematically translate colloquial observations into precise, factual, and logically structured sentences using formal language.
  • structure their own conceptual ideas derived from current classroom activities and independently put them into writing using appropriate technical terms.
  • critically reflect on their own language translation process and evaluate their individual strengths and areas for development in the use of formal language.

Target Audience and Level:

Grade 8 and above

non-subject specific contentChemistryBiologyGeographyGerman