Vorlesezeit - Märchen

Learning Objectives

The overarching learning objective is to develop students’ awareness and mastery of the characteristics of academic and subject-specific language, as well as to strengthen their ability to transform language. Students should learn to analyse typical features of academic texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) according to defined criteria, reflect on their functional effects in terms of objectivity and how they guide the reader, and purposefully translate dense, nominalised academic language into clear, accessible verbal style using active voice.

Content and Methods

The worksheet introduces the key characteristics of academic non-fiction texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) and combines text analysis with practical language exercises. Working with a subject-specific text, students first compile a glossary of technical terms with context-based definitions and distinguish between passive constructions and nominal style using a two-colour highlighting technique.

Building on this, they conduct a functional stylistic analysis to examine the intended effects of linguistic density and the author’s conveyed stance towards the subject matter. The worksheet concludes with an active language transformation task in which students rewrite a highly nominalised example sentence that omits the agent, turning it into dynamic active-voice sentences. This involves breaking down complex verb-noun constructions and explicitly introducing the actors performing the actions.

Competencies

• Linguistic and grammatical analysis: Confidently identifying and clarifying technical terminology, as well as recognising syntactic forms of linguistic compression (nominal style and passive constructions).
• Functional and stylistic judgement: Reflecting on the rhetorical effects and functions of linguistic distance, objectivity, and impersonal presentation in academic texts.
• Language transformation: Purposefully translating complex, agentless nominal constructions into clear, action-oriented active sentences using verbal style.
• Lexical comprehension: Deriving the meaning of unfamiliar or highly specialised technical terms from context and formulating concise definitions (glossary work).

Target Group and Level

Upper secondary school (advanced level).

Create an autumn-themed coloring page for your students.

The overarching learning objective is the systematic development of reading comprehension and linguistic reflection. Learners will be enabled to classify words according to grammatical and semantic properties (parts of speech, concrete vs. abstract nouns) and to decode the emotional impact of language (denotation vs. connotation) in order to critically question manipulative text structures in everyday life and the media.

Content and Methods: The worksheet embeds fundamental grammatical knowledge into a playful fantasy scenario (“Magic Library”). First, learners sort a word collection by parts of speech and semantic dimensions, which is subsequently structured cooperatively in a mind map (“thought tree”) and reinforced through a physical movement game in the classroom. Building on this, a theoretical and practical introduction to the concepts of denotation and connotation takes place. Learners examine word clusters on an “emotion scale,” unmask evaluative PR terminology, and apply their knowledge practically by rewriting a negative review into a positive text through the targeted replacement of emotionally charged words.

Competencies:

• Grammatical analysis competence: Confident identification and classification of parts of speech, as well as the precise distinction between concrete and abstract terms.
• Semantic reflection competence: Understanding the distinction between the objective meaning (denotation) and the emotional resonance (connotation) of words.
• Media and linguistic critique skills: Recognizing linguistic manipulation and evaluative wording in everyday texts, reviews, or media reports.
• Formulation competence: Targeted and deliberate use of evaluative language to modify the overall impact of a text (rewriting/reframing).

Target Group: Lower and middle secondary school

Note: Small word cards must be prepared for the “Who Am I?” game.

This worksheet aims to provide students with a solid understanding of the significance and function of academic language and to help them practice actively using it in subject-specific instruction. Students will recognize that academic language serves as an essential tool for presenting complex topics in an objective, impersonal, and precise manner, and that the ability to switch between everyday language and academic language is a key skill. Through guided practice in translating everyday observations into formal language, they learn to use subject-specific linguistic tools, to put their own thoughts into writing in a structured manner, and to reflectively evaluate their own learning process and linguistic expression.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines cognitive awareness, guided writing practice, independent text production, and self-evaluation. After an introductory informational text on the distinction between everyday language and academic language, as well as an introduction to subject-specific language tools (e.g., for cause-and-effect relationships, hypothesis formation, or evaluations), learners gradually translate given everyday statements into logically structured academic language. They then apply this translation technique to their own current course material and reflect on the advantages and challenges of academic language formulation. The module concludes with a structured self-assessment matrix designed to evaluate their own language competencies and identify remaining learning needs.

Competencies:

Learners can...

• identify the difference between everyday language and academic language and explain the importance of precise technical language for subject-matter understanding.
• identify and purposefully apply specific subject-specific language tools (e.g., phrasing guides for descriptions, justifications, and analyses).
• systematically translate colloquial observations into precise, factual, and logically structured sentences using formal language.
• structure their own conceptual ideas derived from current classroom activities and independently put them into writing using appropriate technical terms.
• critically reflect on their own language translation process and evaluate their individual strengths and areas for development in the use of formal language.

Target Audience and Level:

Grade 8 and above

This worksheet aims to raise students' awareness of hidden advertising and sponsored content across social media platforms, equipping them to critically evaluate disclosure labels and understand the commercial mechanisms behind creator brand partnerships.

Content and methods: The worksheet introduces covert advertising through a true/false warm-up and key vocabulary definitions (such as affiliate links, discount codes, and PR packages). Using a signal checklist, students independently analyze and categorize six real-world social media case studies, comparing their findings in pairs ("Ad Detective"). They then evaluate disclosure transparency using the "Label Test" and rewrite non-compliant posts to ensure transparent disclosure. A final challenge question prompts students to reflect on why commercial brands often prefer covert marketing strategies.

Competencies:

• Identifying and distinguishing between overt, hidden, and non-commercial social media content
• Criteria-based media analysis using visual signals, hashtags, and disclosure placement
• Critical evaluation of promotional transparency and legal disclosure standards
• Practical writing and communication skills by redrafting posts with compliant disclosures
• Collaborative reasoning and debate through partner discussion

Target group: Middle School

The primary learning objective is advancing English reading comprehension, enhancing reading fluency on sentence and short paragraph levels, expanding thematic vocabulary, and developing written response skills in English for primary and lower secondary learners.

Contents and Methods: The worksheet combines a short, connected thematic reading passage with subsequent open-ended text comprehension questions. Methodologically, learners read clear, structured declarative sentences focused on everyday social interaction, empathy, and friendship. They then verify and deepen their reading comprehension by formulating concise written answers in English to targeted open questions regarding key details, central messages, and cause-and-effect relationships in the text.

Competencies:

• Reading & Decoding Skills (English): fluent reading, reliable decoding of simple connected sentences, and structural understanding of basic English texts
• Reading Comprehension & Text Analysis: extracting explicit details, identifying central themes, and understanding simple cause-and-effect relationships
• Writing & Expression Skills (English): formulating clear, short written responses in English using appropriate thematic vocabulary

Target Group: Grade 5 and above

This worksheet aims to teach students the fundamental rules of English punctuation through a series of "detective missions". It focuses on the correct application of end marks, commas in lists, and colons to improve overall writing clarity and sentence structure.

Content and Methods: The worksheet employs a gamified "detective headquarters" theme to guide students through three targeted exercises and one comprehensive final task. It uses fill-in-the-blank sentences for end punctuation, identification tasks for commas and colons, and a final proofreading exercise where students must rewrite a continuous text by applying punctuation and capitalization correctly. A "cheat sheet" is provided to support independent learning and rule reinforcement.

Competencies:

• Punctuation Proficiency: Correct use of periods, question marks, exclamation marks, commas, and colons
• Grammar and Mechanics: Application of capitalization rules in context
• Proofreading and Editing: Identifying missing structural cues in unpunctuated text
• Syntactic Awareness: Recognizing list structures and introductory elements in sentences

Target Group: Grade 3 and above

This worksheet aims to provide a comprehensive comparison between artificial and human intelligence, specifically focusing on the mechanisms of creativity and memory. It encourages students to critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of AI while reflecting on the unique qualities of human thought and emotion.

Content and methods: The worksheet employs a variety of pedagogical approaches, including comparative tables for self-assessment, creative writing prompts, and reflective questions based on personal experience. It integrates technical texts and a video lesson to explain AI learning models (supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning) and human memory types (episodic, emotional, semantic, and sensory). The material concludes with a case study on AI in a professional field and a group discussion to synthesize the ethical and social implications of human-AI collaboration.

Competencies:

• Analytical thinking: Comparing cognitive processes between machines and humans
• Media literacy: Understanding different machine learning methods and AI data sources
• Reading and audiovisual comprehension: Extracting information from specialized texts and video content
• Creative and reflective writing: Producing original content and analyzing one's own creative influences
• Ethical evaluation: Discussing the impact of AI on society, trust, and professional fields

Target group: Grade 9 and above

Objective: The worksheet serves to educate students about the growing phenomenon of artificial intelligence addiction. Students should be made aware of the line between helpful support and compulsive use, reflect on their own behavior, and develop strategies for a healthy balance.

Content and methods: The content covers the concept of AI addiction, typical characteristics of dependency such as loss of control, tolerance development, and withdrawal symptoms, as well as psychological and neurobiological causes. This is supplemented by case studies on problematic and risky use, opportunities and risks of intensive AI application, and strategies for prevention and healthy use in everyday life. The methods include self-tests and self-assessments of one's own usage behavior, explanatory information texts, comparative case analyses, structured reflection phases on warning signs and possible courses of action, as well as creative transfer tasks such as designing rule posters with dos and don'ts.

Competencies:

• Self-reflection skills: Ability to critically evaluate one's own digital usage behavior
• Analytical skills: Identification of psychological warning signs and long-term social consequences of addiction
• Action skills: Development of usage rules and solutions for regaining self-control
• Health competence: Understanding the effects of AI on emotion regulation and general well-being

Target group and level: From grade 8 onwards

Objective: This worksheet provides an in-depth understanding of the technical fundamentals and ethical implications of artificial intelligence at the upper secondary level. The aim is to go beyond mere application and understand the underlying mechanisms (such as neural networks and machine learning) and critically reflect on their social implications.

Content and methods: The content covers fundamental technical concepts of artificial intelligence such as machine learning, deep learning, and neural networks, the distinction between weak and strong AI, and the analysis of everyday digital applications according to criteria such as data volume, algorithms, and learning ability. This is supplemented by practical case studies on personalized learning systems and ethical and social issues such as bias, responsibility, and the impact on learning and creativity. The methods include technical term explanations, comparative classification tasks, scenario-based case analyses, multi-perspective role-plays from different points of interest, and stimulating discussion and position exercises in the classroom, in which learners justify and reflect on their attitudes.

Competencies:

• Technical expertise: Confident use of technical terms such as algorithms, training data, and artificial neurons.
• Analytical skills: Ability to identify the role of training data and bias in AI models.
• Ethical judgment: Reflection on data protection and discrimination risks.
• Discussion and argumentation skills: Ability to represent complex positions within a role-play and in a plenary discussion

Target group and level: From grade 10 onwards