to teach logo
Sign up

Method Training: Conducting Interviews (Introduction)

TT
by to-teach Team
4 pagesGrade 6 and abovenon-subject specific content, Politics
Template

Loading preview…

Your worksheet

Enter a topic area for students to conduct interviews.

Need an idea?

Popular topics from other teachers

How our AI templates work

  • Content gets adapted

    Examples, texts and tasks match your focus.

  • Method & structure stay

    The didactically reviewed structure of the template won't change.

Description

Objective: This worksheet aims to introduce students to the fundamentals of conducting social science interviews, equipping them with the necessary knowledge and skills for successful interviewing.


Content and methods: The worksheet begins by defining social science interviews, explaining their purpose, and providing practical examples. It encourages small group discussions on why people share stories and what can be discovered through interviews. A key component is the collaborative creation of a mind map covering important terms and aspects of interview conduction, with a sample solution provided for teachers. The worksheet also includes questions based on an external YouTube video ("How to Conduct an Interview") to assess students' understanding of interview procedures. Finally, it introduces different interview types (structured, unstructured, semi-structured) and tasks students with matching the most suitable interview type to given topics, as well as formulating their own interview questions.


Competencies:

  • Reading comprehension and information processing
  • Critical thinking and problem-solving (e.g., selecting appropriate interview types)
  • Communication and teamwork (discussion, mind map creation)
  • Media literacy (utilizing the YouTube video)
  • Analytical thinking (answering multiple-choice questions)
  • Creativity and question formulation (developing own interview questions)
  • Reflection (identifying qualities of a good interviewer)


Target group: Grade 6 and above

Similar worksheets

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Subject specific written language - linguistic devices

Learning Objectives

The overarching learning objective is to develop students’ awareness and mastery of the characteristics of academic and subject-specific language, as well as to strengthen their ability to transform language. Students should learn to analyse typical features of academic texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) according to defined criteria, reflect on their functional effects in terms of objectivity and how they guide the reader, and purposefully translate dense, nominalised academic language into clear, accessible verbal style using active voice.

Content and Methods

The worksheet introduces the key characteristics of academic non-fiction texts (technical terminology, passive voice, and nominal style) and combines text analysis with practical language exercises. Working with a subject-specific text, students first compile a glossary of technical terms with context-based definitions and distinguish between passive constructions and nominal style using a two-colour highlighting technique.

Building on this, they conduct a functional stylistic analysis to examine the intended effects of linguistic density and the author’s conveyed stance towards the subject matter. The worksheet concludes with an active language transformation task in which students rewrite a highly nominalised example sentence that omits the agent, turning it into dynamic active-voice sentences. This involves breaking down complex verb-noun constructions and explicitly introducing the actors performing the actions.

Competencies

  • Linguistic and grammatical analysis: Confidently identifying and clarifying technical terminology, as well as recognising syntactic forms of linguistic compression (nominal style and passive constructions).
  • Functional and stylistic judgement: Reflecting on the rhetorical effects and functions of linguistic distance, objectivity, and impersonal presentation in academic texts.
  • Language transformation: Purposefully translating complex, agentless nominal constructions into clear, action-oriented active sentences using verbal style.
  • Lexical comprehension: Deriving the meaning of unfamiliar or highly specialised technical terms from context and formulating concise definitions (glossary work).

Target Group and Level

Upper secondary school (advanced level).

GeographyBiologyPoliticsChemistryHistory
Reading comprehension -  Sorting words by characteristics

Reading comprehension - Sorting words by characteristics

The overarching learning objective is the systematic development of reading comprehension and linguistic reflection. Learners will be enabled to classify words according to grammatical and semantic properties (parts of speech, concrete vs. abstract nouns) and to decode the emotional impact of language (denotation vs. connotation) in order to critically question manipulative text structures in everyday life and the media.


Content and Methods: The worksheet embeds fundamental grammatical knowledge into a playful fantasy scenario (“Magic Library”). First, learners sort a word collection by parts of speech and semantic dimensions, which is subsequently structured cooperatively in a mind map (“thought tree”) and reinforced through a physical movement game in the classroom. Building on this, a theoretical and practical introduction to the concepts of denotation and connotation takes place. Learners examine word clusters on an “emotion scale,” unmask evaluative PR terminology, and apply their knowledge practically by rewriting a negative review into a positive text through the targeted replacement of emotionally charged words.


Competencies:

  • Grammatical analysis competence: Confident identification and classification of parts of speech, as well as the precise distinction between concrete and abstract terms.
  • Semantic reflection competence: Understanding the distinction between the objective meaning (denotation) and the emotional resonance (connotation) of words.
  • Media and linguistic critique skills: Recognizing linguistic manipulation and evaluative wording in everyday texts, reviews, or media reports.
  • Formulation competence: Targeted and deliberate use of evaluative language to modify the overall impact of a text (rewriting/reframing).

Target Group: Lower and middle secondary school

Note: Small word cards must be prepared for the “Who Am I?” game.

non-subject specific contentEnglish
From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

From Everyday to Academic Language: Analyzing, Formulating & Reflecting

This worksheet aims to provide students with a solid understanding of the significance and function of academic language and to help them practice actively using it in subject-specific instruction. Students will recognize that academic language serves as an essential tool for presenting complex topics in an objective, impersonal, and precise manner, and that the ability to switch between everyday language and academic language is a key skill. Through guided practice in translating everyday observations into formal language, they learn to use subject-specific linguistic tools, to put their own thoughts into writing in a structured manner, and to reflectively evaluate their own learning process and linguistic expression.

Content and Methods:

The worksheet combines cognitive awareness, guided writing practice, independent text production, and self-evaluation. After an introductory informational text on the distinction between everyday language and academic language, as well as an introduction to subject-specific language tools (e.g., for cause-and-effect relationships, hypothesis formation, or evaluations), learners gradually translate given everyday statements into logically structured academic language. They then apply this translation technique to their own current course material and reflect on the advantages and challenges of academic language formulation. The module concludes with a structured self-assessment matrix designed to evaluate their own language competencies and identify remaining learning needs.

Competencies:

Learners can...

  • identify the difference between everyday language and academic language and explain the importance of precise technical language for subject-matter understanding.
  • identify and purposefully apply specific subject-specific language tools (e.g., phrasing guides for descriptions, justifications, and analyses).
  • systematically translate colloquial observations into precise, factual, and logically structured sentences using formal language.
  • structure their own conceptual ideas derived from current classroom activities and independently put them into writing using appropriate technical terms.
  • critically reflect on their own language translation process and evaluate their individual strengths and areas for development in the use of formal language.

Target Audience and Level:

Grade 8 and above

non-subject specific contentChemistryBiologyGeographyGerman
Understanding Influencer Marketing

Understanding Influencer Marketing

This worksheet aims to raise students’ awareness of the mechanisms, economic dimensions, and psychological strategies of modern digital marketing in everyday life.

Content and Methods: The material focuses on the economic significance of social media marketing based on statistical data, as well as the analysis of specific digital posts. Methodologically, the worksheet relies on a combination of practical case studies—in which an exemplary social media post is deconstructed both textually and statistically—and theoretical insights into behavioral economic effects. In addition, the material encourages multi-perspective discussion through reflective writing assignments and the comparison of contrasting stakeholder perspectives. Finally, the discussion of complex issues is used to synthesize what has been learned into the formation of independent judgments.

Competencies:

Analytical and Deconstructive Competence: The ability to systematically examine media content and linguistic and statistical devices for their manipulative or promotional effects

Reflective and Critical Thinking Competence: The ability to critically examine one’s own consumer behavior and evaluate economic phenomena from different perspectives

Media and Economic Competence: Understanding of digital market mechanisms, psychological influence strategies such as the authority bias or the bandwagon effect, and their impact on the economy

Target Audience and Level: 9th/10th grade

EconomicsPolitics